National Assembly Data Analysis: Rep. Park Chung-kwon's Rebellion Rate Stands at Mere 2.4%

Analysis of Rep. Park Chung-kwon's Bill Voting Tendencies

According to quantitative analysis data on lawmakers, Rep. Park Chung-kwon of the People Power Party (PPP) closely aligns with the general ruling party line on economic issues. Conversely, on social issues, he is found to take a slightly more conservative stance than his party's average. Interpreting the ideological tendency index—derived from bill sponsorships and voting records—reveals that his position on economic issues borders on moderate right. However, regarding social matters, he is analyzed to exhibit a distinctly conservative streak even within the PPP. Comparing the differences in his tendencies across the two fields, a notable characteristic emerges: the ideological variance between issues is greater than his party-aligned movements on economic agendas.

Political Implications of the Low Rebellion Rate

Measured based on legislative voting records, Rep. Park's rebellion rate against his party's official stance was a mere 2.4%. This implies that instances of him voting against the ruling party's decided line across hundreds of roll calls were extremely rare. It is a highly respectable figure, showing no inferiority even when compared to the average party-line adherence rate among all PPP lawmakers. This demonstrates a political behavior that prioritizes the party's collective decision-making above his personal convictions or the specific demands of his constituency. It suggests that he has served as a reliable source of stable votes during the passage of his party's key policies. Such strong party discipline acts as a factor that increases predictability during the bill negotiation process with fellow lawmakers.

Disparity Between Public Perception and Quantitative Metrics

A politician's public image, shaped by their activities in the Special Committee on Ethics or other major standing committees, often differs from quantitative data derived solely from bill voting records. A politician who speaks forcefully in debates or fiercely criticizes specific issues may actually take a very moderate stance when it comes time to vote. Rep. Park's bill support tendencies also show a certain gap between his rhetoric in front of the cameras and the digitized data on record. There is a clear limitation: quantitative metrics are based exclusively on the National Assembly's core and practical decision-making behaviors—namely, bill sponsorships and votes. Therefore, it is essential to consider during the analysis process that these figures do not immediately represent every facet of a lawmaker's political profile.

Review of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Industry Ties

A review through the official National Assembly registry system confirmed that Rep. Park currently holds no stocks related to the industries overseen by his respective standing committee, nor has he received large political donations from such sectors. This suggests that the risk of conflicts between private interests and public duties during the bill deliberation process has been preemptively blocked. As no illegal conflict of interest elements are apparent in the publicly available data, his profile can be evaluated as relatively clean in terms of financial integrity. However, transparent information disclosure must continue whenever he is afforded the opportunity to engage in specific economic sectors in the future as a lawmaker. Voters should evaluate the politician's objective legislative activities based on the provided quantitative data and utilize it as material for judgment in the upcoming elections.

Lawmakers Mentioned in the Article

Lawmaker	Party	Ideological Leaning	Notes
Park Chung-kwon	People Power Party	Economic Right · Social Conservative	Self