Controversy over 'Unfair Contracts' Signed in the Name of Daechi-dong Exam Institute Director

It has been revealed that a college entrance exam institute in Daechi-dong, a hub for private education, coerced parents into unfair, one-sided contracts by leveraging the director's popularity. The institute, which touts its high local recognition, is facing criticism for entering into so-called 'gapjil' (abusive) contracts that deviate from industry norms.

Authorities have launched a detailed investigation into unfair trading practices, with plans to rectify transaction order in the private education market.

A contract obtained from the Daechi-dong institute was found to contain clauses favorable to the director personally. The institute applied unfavorable terms to consumers regarding the scope of service provision and refund regulations after the contract was signed. It was also confirmed that the director used their superior position to force conditions.

The discovery of unusual contracts and abusive practices at the Daechi-dong institute has raised issues regarding the contract structure and service value assessment system of the education consulting industry. As the transaction practices of the Daechi-dong institute become known, the structural characteristics of the private education market are being brought to light.

Victims have gathered contract cases and related materials to consider legal action and requested an investigation from relevant authorities.